As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.
Hello Team,
I am using Activity 5.22.0.
I noticed that group_id_ and task_id_ are not captured in act_hi_idenitylink table When task is assigned to candidate.
Does it get assigned in the runtime equivalent for that history table i.e. in act_ru_identitylink ? And if so do they later get set in act_hi_idenitylink (e.g. after completion)? I presume you're looking to use the information in a service task and finding that you can't get it. Some relevant parts of the v5 code to look at are Activiti/ClaimTaskCmd.java at 5.x · Activiti/Activiti · GitHub and Activiti/DefaultHistoryManager.java at 5.x · Activiti/Activiti · GitHub . This seems to be implemented quite differently in v6. This is the command class in v6 features Activiti/ClaimTaskCmd.java at 6.x · Activiti/Activiti · GitHub which calls Activiti/TaskEntityManagerImpl.java at 6.x · Activiti/Activiti · GitHub
Hello Ryan,
let me explain you in detail.
i have assigned task from user_task to user and i have noticed below details from act_hi_identitylink and act_ru_identitylink:
1. when task captured in user_task --> no group_id and task_id captured. type_ is candidate
2. i assigned particular task to user --> no group_id and task_id. type_ is participant and user_id_ is captured
above results are same even after task completed.
is it a bug ?
Oh I see, the record is created but those two field are not populated.
My sense is that it's correct that the group_id is not populated. I believe this is because the user might have multiple groups could qualify them for the task and they might also be a candidate in their own right rather than through the group. It's therefore not clear what we should want for group in every case.
I am less sure about whether it's a bug if the task_id is blank. I suspect that this doesn't get populated there because it is instead recorded elsewhere - presumably in ACT_RU_TASK and ACT_HI_TASKINST?
