As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.
Winsock rx2 len=4910:24:32,210 ERROR [alfresco.smb.protocol] Closing session due to exceptionorg.alfresco.filesys.netbios.win32.WinsockNetBIOSException: null - Message too long at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.win32.WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.readPacket(WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.java:138) at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.SMBSrvSession.runSMBSrvSession.java:1511) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
When I try to copy a set of files (49 docs, 15 Mo) through CIFS, Alfresco closes the port and raises the following exception:Winsock rx2 len=4910:24:32,210 ERROR [alfresco.smb.protocol] Closing session due to exceptionorg.alfresco.filesys.netbios.win32.WinsockNetBIOSException: null - Message too long at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.win32.WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.readPacket(WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.java:138) at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.SMBSrvSession.runSMBSrvSession.java:1511) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)Only 20% of the files are processed before the problem occurs.I operate that copy from a Window OS to an Alfresco 1.4 repository.Are there some limitations in the CIFS usage ?Thanks.
In that example, I've picked up 49 docs from a local filesystem and dropped them in a CIFS directory bound to my client files explorer. And "only 20% of the files were processed".Neither 49 nor 20% are magic numbers.Sometimes, Alfresco may copy up to 30%, maybe 40% of the files.But other times, the repo can't climb further than 15%.And I can see no huge (or corrupted or evil) file hidden among the others.Let's sum up: opposite to FTP, CIFS seems not to be able to stand the load.Can users rely on CIFS ?