nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

CallActivity : Modeler does not add omgdc:Bounds

anuppc72

Hi,

The Call Activity does not add omgdc:Bounds tag in the bpmn20.xml

What is generated is :      <bpmndi:BPMNShape bpmnElement="callactivity1" id="BPMNShape_callactivity1"> </bpmndi:BPMNShape>

and what is expected is :

      <bpmndi:BPMNShape bpmnElement="callactivity1" id="BPMNShape_callactivity1">
        <omgdc:Bounds height="53" width="81" x="250" y="185"></omgdc:Bounds>
      </bpmndi:BPMNShape>

Looks like a bug?

-Anup

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

trademak

Hi,

Could be a bug. I tried to reproduce it, but it generates the DI information fine here.
Is it possible to share your diagram?

Best regards,

anuppc72

Hi,

The main process is ChangeRequest and the other 2 are used in the callactivity. Hope this helps.

Thanks
Anup

activitiTest.zip

trademak

Hi Anup,

The problems was that there were two call activities that didn't appear in the diagram, but where still part of the object tree.
I've committed a fix to trunk that prevents the BPMN XML export of elements that don't have any sequence flow attached to them.
That also solves your problem.

Best regards,

anuppc72

Thanks. However i think there is some other related issue in terms of delete (My guess). These 2 dangling callactivity definitions were leftover by some incomplete deletes?? Bcoz i haven't modified the XML directly i have used the palette to drag and drop shapes. I had these callactivities within my main process then possibly i deleted them to recreate them within a in-line subprocess. So perhaps there is a delete related bug perhaps?

-Anup

trademak

Yes you're right. It's however not easy to reproduce this.
I didn't encounter it yet. So if you see a pattern in how this delete bug can be reproduced, please let me know.

Best regards,