nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

How to restrict user to search for site-member of that site only rather than all?

nwali

I am new to Alfresco and using Alfresco Community 5.0.d & aio sdk for customising the application.

I am not able to get a way to restrict user of Site-A to search & see only Site-A members where as in current scenario if user search for member in Site-A then the result comes combined from Site-A, Site-B and so on.

Thanks in advance.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

afaust

There is no easy / configurable way to only show only those users of the same site(s) in the global user search. All users are publicly visible by default and as such can be found by anyone. This needs to be that way for various functionalities, e.g. inviting other users to sites or assigning ad-hoc tasks.

douglascrp

Axel Faust‌ I was able to implement that requirement by reusing part of this project GitHub - cggh/cggh-alfresco-extensions: Alfresco customizations

Home · cggh/cggh-alfresco-extensions Wiki · GitHub

The configuration for this is here Repo extensions · cggh/cggh-alfresco-extensions Wiki · GitHub

afaust

Obviously I was not saying it is impossible. Touching the public-services-security-context.xml is not something that is considered a "recommended" approach to customization by Alfresco. In another thread I made a mention of adding / changing AOP handling and that person did not get the hint that that would be a rather invasive change (for a beginner) and immediately wanted to know how it can be done. So I try to not mention this anymore...

douglascrp

I know you didn't say that

And I have to agree with you... Telling people to try it without understanding the implications is kind of risky.

nwali

Hi Douglas,

I went through the links provided but its kinda bit confusing. Could you narrow down what exact modification needs to be taken care of? I saw there are many files to be changed but what exactly to be modified in those files?

Thanks.

douglascrp

Hey

I have to agree with what Axel said before. If you are not able to understand what that code does, then you shouldn't be messing with it.

That is not a recommended change, at least not without understanding all that can go wrong, and even more when you perform an upgrade.

If you can, try to convince your users to let it the way it is, and avoid performing those changes.