nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect

bengrah

Hi guys,

Is it possible to run a Lucene search which returns a list of nodes which don't have the Versionable aspect applied?

We have a rule which automatically versions documents being added, but it looks like this doesn't work when documents are added via a Windows 7 WebDAV drive. I've been trying to write a Lucene query which gets all docs from within a folder that do not have the Versionable aspect, so that way I can retroactively apply it using Javascript:

PATH:"/Folder//*" AND NOT ASPECT:"cm:versionable"

But this tends to return nodes which have the Versionable aspect applied anyway. Anyone have any suggestions here?

Thanks,
ben.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

andy

Hi

Try using alfrecso FTS and/or try

+PATH:"/Folder//*" -ASPECT:"cm:versionable"

There a re some bug in the lucene query parser we hhok into for some queries.
Using + - explicitly usually gets by …

Andy

bengrah

Hi

Try using alfrecso FTS and/or try

+PATH:"/Folder//*" -ASPECT:"cm:versionable"

There a re some bug in the lucene query parser we hhok into for some queries.
Using + - explicitly usually gets by …

Andy

Hi Andy,

Thanks for that, I'll give it a shot. Is using FTS any quicker over Lucene any chance?

Cheers,
Ben.

andy

Hi

The lucene query parser and AFTS query parser both generate lucene queries.
They will generate the same queries - AFTS generates more for you and allows macros etc - and is ours so easy to fix 🙂

As they do the same thing inteh end - the execution speed will be the same.
If you use SOLR they are also cached in the same way.

Andy