nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

Activiti Bean Registry

marco_altieri_7

I do not find in the documentation why the activiti bean registry registers beans by their class name instead of by id.

I think that it would help to know the reason to better understand how it works.

This solution seems less flexible because I cannot reuse the same class to define two different beans.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

marco_altieri_7

Actually it is not the activiti bean registry but the Alfresco BaseJavaDelegate that uses the name instead of the ID. This can be easily changed.

jbarrez

Sorry, this is the Activiti forum, we can't do nothing about the BaseJavaDelegate in Alfresco.

marco_altieri_7

I understand. The best solution for anyone that is using Activiti in the Alfresco repository is to re-implement/extend BaseJavaDelegate registering the bean using its id and not the class name: it's not difficult using the BeanNameAware interface.