nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

Master-Master Replication

rdanner

Master-Master Replication

What can you guys tell me about this objective? What is it really? How far are we? When can be expected?

What is the proposed topology? How about server affinity?

In the short term is there a possibility of using Redhat clustering (server level) as a lowest common denominator solution to redundancy with alfresco?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

paulhh

Hey Russ - what would you expect of Master-Master replication, and what from your experience should we pay particular attention to?

Cheers
Paul.

mikee_cz

Hello,
What is your opinion on using instead of master to master replication high-available geographicly cluster filesystem for the system to enable high-available DMS system. Is it possible to configure Alfresco to run more instances and share for the binary attachements the high-available geographical filesystem. Is there some issue related to the locking of files when simultaneous access occures? Is there some issue related to the slow response when the geographical distance of the each site is not small (for example distance about 20km).
Thanks for the answer. Michal