NativeTaskQuery listpage

As we transition to the new Hyland Community, some post links may be temporarily disrupted as we finalize redirects. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible. Details.

vvstraet

According to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-1588, there should be support for pagination (listpage() operation) for native Queries in version 5.12.

However, when trying to use this, I find the NativeTaskQuery API:

package org.activiti.engine.task;

public interface NativeTaskQuery extends org.activiti.engine.query.NativeQuery<org.activiti.engine.task.NativeTaskQuery,org.activiti.engine.task.Task> {
}
‍‍‍‍‍‍

and the NativeQuery API:

public interface NativeQuery<T extends org.activiti.engine.query.NativeQuery<?,?>, U>   {
    T sql(java.lang.String s);
    T parameter(java.lang.String s, java.lang.Object o);
    long count();
    U singleResult();
    java.util.List<U> list();
}
‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍

No listPage() to be found on these interfaces …

My maven imports are - I think - correct to import Activiti 5.12:

…
<dependencies>
     …
     <!– Activiti –>
     <dependency>
          <groupId>org.activiti</groupId>
          <artifactId>activiti-spring</artifactId>
          <version>5.12</version>
     </dependency>
…
‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍

Am I missing something here or is this feature really not implemented?

udoderk

According to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-1588, there should be support for pagination (listpage() operation) for native Queries in version 5.12.
….

Am I missing something here or is this feature really not implemented?

Hi,
The support of pagination for native queries pull backed :roll:
See also github history with description "Pull back native query paging due to mssql and db2 errors on qa " for the classes

Activiti / modules / activiti-engine / src / main / java / org / activiti / engine / query / NativeQuery.java
and

Activiti / modules / activiti-engine / src / main / java / org / activiti / engine / impl / AbstractNativeQuery.java

The state of issue ACT-1588 is imho not correct